Comments on: Using ActiveRecord with EventMachine http://www.mikeperham.com/2010/03/30/using-activerecord-with-eventmachine/ On Ruby, software and the Internet Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:12:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Mike Perham http://www.mikeperham.com/2010/03/30/using-activerecord-with-eventmachine/comment-page-1/#comment-536 Mike Perham Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:32:17 +0000 http://www.mikeperham.com/?p=494#comment-536 Thanks guys. I'm not targeting Rails 3 as it is still a moving target, i.e. under construction. Now that I've got Rails 2.3 working though, I will probably spend some time looking into Rails 3. There's no way to port my solution to non-Fibers. You'd need to look at something like Cramp if you want an asynchronous web framework without Fibers. Look for Joe Damato and Aman Gupta's post on backporting Fibers to Ruby 1.8. It can be done. Thanks guys. I’m not targeting Rails 3 as it is still a moving target, i.e. under construction. Now that I’ve got Rails 2.3 working though, I will probably spend some time looking into Rails 3.

There’s no way to port my solution to non-Fibers. You’d need to look at something like Cramp if you want an asynchronous web framework without Fibers.

Look for Joe Damato and Aman Gupta’s post on backporting Fibers to Ruby 1.8. It can be done.

]]> By: Tomash http://www.mikeperham.com/2010/03/30/using-activerecord-with-eventmachine/comment-page-1/#comment-535 Tomash Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:54:37 +0000 http://www.mikeperham.com/?p=494#comment-535 This is one of the coolest things being done to rails since the decisions that led to rails3. I'm glad event-based programming is getting more popular in web programming, with node.js being the most prominent example. Any chance of porting your solution to non-fiber ruby 1.8, or do you want it to remain 1.9-only? This is one of the coolest things being done to rails since the decisions that led to rails3.

I’m glad event-based programming is getting more popular in web programming, with node.js being the most prominent example.

Any chance of porting your solution to non-fiber ruby 1.8, or do you want it to remain 1.9-only?

]]> By: Daniel Schierbeck http://www.mikeperham.com/2010/03/30/using-activerecord-with-eventmachine/comment-page-1/#comment-533 Daniel Schierbeck Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:06:39 +0000 http://www.mikeperham.com/?p=494#comment-533 Great work! Will this also work for Rails 3? Hopefully, the decoupling introduced there would negate the need for monkey patching. Great work! Will this also work for Rails 3? Hopefully, the decoupling introduced there would negate the need for monkey patching.

]]>